DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING LEGAL ENGLISH: A MODEL FORENHANCING SOCIOLINGUISTIC AWARENESS IN LAW STUDENTS
Keywords:
digital learning, legal English, sociolinguistic competenceAbstract
Mazkur maqolada yuridik yo‘nalish talabalari uchun ingliz tilini o‘qitishda raqamli texnologiyalar asosida sotsiolingvistik kompetensiyani rivojlantirishning nazariy va metodologik asoslari tahlil qilinadi. Onlayn simulyatsiyalar, virtual sud jarayonlari va interfaol pedagogik vositalar integratsiyasiga asoslangan konseptual model ishlab chiqildi. Tadqiqot natijalari raqamli muhitda tashkil etilgan institutsional diskurs amaliyoti talabalar nutqining pragmatik moslashuvchanligini, rasmiy reestrni boshqarish ko‘nikmasini hamda professional kommunikativ aniqlikni oshirishini ko‘rsatadiReferences
1. Basturkmen, H. (2024). Developing courses in English for specific purposes (2nd ed.).
Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Bhatia, V. K. (2023). Analysing genre in professional contexts. Routledge.
“Ilmiy tadqiqotlarni amaliyotga joriy qilishning muammo va yechimlari” mavzusidagi onlayn
xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy anjuman materiallar to‘plami. NamDU - 2026-yil 20-21-fevral
journal.namdu.uz --- 400 --- universaljurnal.uz
3. Blyth, C. (2024). Digital mediation and pragmatic competence in professional
communication. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 45–63.
4. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages:
Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
5. Darics, E., & Koller, V. (2025). Digital discourse and institutional communication: Power,
pragmatics and participation. Discourse, Context & Media, 64, 100–118.
6. Godwin-Jones, R. (2024). AI, multimodality and the future of language education. Language
Learning & Technology, 28(2), 3–18.
7. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2022). Developing online language teaching: Research-based
pedagogies. ReCALL, 34(2), 123–138.
8. Hyland, K. (2022). English for specific purposes: Theory and practice. Routledge.
9. Johnson, L., & Walsh, S. (2024). Virtual courtroom discourse: Interactional dynamics in
remote hearings. Journal of Pragmatics, 221, 75–89.
10.Miller, R. I. (2024). The quality movements in higher education in the United States. Higher
Education in Europe, 49(2–3), 215–230.
11.Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2021). Peer interaction and corrective feedback in digital learning
environments. Modern Language Journal, 105(4), 789–805.
