HUQUQIY INGLIZ TILINI O'QITISHDA RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR: HUQUQ TALABALARINING IJTIMOIY-LINGVISTIK XABARDORLIGINI OSHIRISH UCHUN NAMUNA
Kalit so‘zlar:
raqamli ta’lim, yuridik ingliz tili, sotsiolingvistik kompetensiyaAbstrak
Ushbu maqolada yuridik yo‘nalish talabalari uchun ingliz tilini o‘qitishda
huquqiy asoslarga asoslangan sotsiolingvistik kompetentsiyani rivojlantirishning nazariy va
metodologik asoslari tahlil. Onlayn simulyatsiyalar, virtual sud jarayonlari va interfaol
pedagogik integratsiyalashuv siyosatiga raqobatbardosh model ishlab chiqildi. tadqiqot
raqamli muhitda tashkil etilgan institutsional diskurs amaliyoti talabalar nutqining pragmatik
ligini, rasmiy reestrni boshqarish ko‘nikmasini hamda professional kommunikativ
aniqlikni belgilang
Havolalar
1. Basturkmen, H. (2024). Developing courses in English for specific purposes (2nd ed.).
Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Bhatia, V. K. (2023). Analysing genre in professional contexts. Routledge.
“Ilmiy tadqiqotlarni amaliyotga joriy qilishning muammo va yechimlari” mavzusidagi onlayn
xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy anjuman materiallar to‘plami. NamDU - 2026-yil 20-21-fevral
journal.namdu.uz --- 400 --- universaljurnal.uz
3. Blyth, C. (2024). Digital mediation and pragmatic competence in professional
communication. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 45–63.
4. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages:
Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
5. Darics, E., & Koller, V. (2025). Digital discourse and institutional communication: Power,
pragmatics and participation. Discourse, Context & Media, 64, 100–118.
6. Godwin-Jones, R. (2024). AI, multimodality and the future of language education. Language
Learning & Technology, 28(2), 3–18.
7. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2022). Developing online language teaching: Research-based
pedagogies. ReCALL, 34(2), 123–138.
8. Hyland, K. (2022). English for specific purposes: Theory and practice. Routledge.
9. Johnson, L., & Walsh, S. (2024). Virtual courtroom discourse: Interactional dynamics in
remote hearings. Journal of Pragmatics, 221, 75–89.
10.Miller, R. I. (2024). The quality movements in higher education in the United States. Higher
Education in Europe, 49(2–3), 215–230.
11.Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2021). Peer interaction and corrective feedback in digital learning
environments. Modern Language Journal, 105(4), 789–805.
