THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF LOVE IN ENGLISH LITERATURE
Keywords:
conceptual metaphor, conceptualization of love, English literary discourseAbstract
This paper investigates the conceptualization of love in English literary discourse within the framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. It argues that love, as an abstract emotional domain, is systematically structured through embodied source domains that shape its representation in literature. Drawing on the works of William Shakespeare and Jane Austen, the study examines how metaphorical models such as LOVE IS FIRE, LOVE IS WAR, and LOVE IS A JOURNEY organize narrative meaning and construct distinct literary worldviews. The analysis demonstrates that Shakespeare conceptualizes love as intense and conflict-driven, foregrounding passion, instability, and emotional risk, whereas Austen presents love as a gradual process of development and moral transformation. These differences reveal how conceptual metaphors function as cognitive frameworks rather than decorative linguistic devices. The findings suggest that metaphor plays a fundamental role in shaping literary representations of romantic experience and reflects broader cultural patterns of understanding emotion in English literary tradition.
References
1. Austen, J., 1813. Pride and Prejudice. London: T. Egerton.
2. Hemingway, E., 1952. The Old Man and the Sea. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
3. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
4. Lakoff, G., 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: A. Ortony, ed. Metaphor and
Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.202 - 251.
5. Kövecses, Z., 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
6. Semino, E., 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Shakespeare, W., 1597. Romeo and Juliet. London: John Danter.
Downloads
Published
2026-03-28
How to Cite
THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF LOVE IN ENGLISH LITERATURE. (2026). Universal International Scientific Journal, 3(3.1), 571-574. https://universaljournal.uz/index.php/uxij/article/view/256