DIGITAL AESTHETICS: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Mavludaxon Joraboy kizi Jorayeva Author

Keywords:

aesthetics, digital aesthetics, philosophy

Abstract

This article examines the new forms of aesthetic perception emerging as a result of the rapid development of digital technologies in the 21st century and their philosophical essence. Digital aesthetics is interpreted as an important scientific direction aimed at deeply analyzing the impact of technological tools on the perception, evaluation and aesthetic creation process of modern man. The research reveals how the traditional categories of aesthetic thinking - beauty, harmony, tragedy and humor - are undergoing transformation in the digital and virtual environment. The article analyzes the specific features of aesthetic experience in digital space using historical-comparative, epistemological and systematic approaches. The theoretical basis of the research is J. Baudrillard's views on simulacrum and hyperreality, J. Lipovetsky's concept of postmodern visuality, and the idea of ​​\u200b\u200b"digital man" put forward by Sh. Turkle. These philosophical approaches shed light on the aesthetic content of digital images and visual forms, their relationship with reality. The results of the study serve to determine the place of the concept of digital aesthetics in modern philosophy and cultural studies, and to establish criteria for evaluating aesthetic values ​​​​formed in a technological environment. The article is of theoretical and practical importance for researchers dealing with the problems of digital culture, philosophy and art

Author Biography

  • Mavludaxon Joraboy kizi Jorayeva

    Master's student at Namangan State University

References

1. Хайдеггер М. Вопрос о технике // The Question Concerning Technology. – New York:

Harper & Row, 1954. – 35 с.

2. Манович Л. Язык новых медиа. – Кембридж: MIT Press, 2001. – 354 с.

3. Липовецкий Ж. Эстетизация мира. – Париж: Gallimard, 2005. – 412 с.

4. Туркл Ш. Одна вместе: Почему мы ожидаем больше от технологий и меньше друг от

друга. – Нью-Йорк: Basic Books, 2011. – 376 с.

5. Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляция. – Париж: Éditions Galilée, 1981. – 236 с.

6. Грау О. Виртуальное искусство: От иллюзии к погружению. – Кембридж: MIT Press,

2003. – 423 с.

7. Флориди Л. Логика информации: Философия как концептуальный дизайн. – Оксфорд:

Oxford University Press, 2019. – 278 с.

8. Кант И. Критика способности суждения. – Кембридж: Cambridge University Press,

2000. – 294 с.

9. Соколов В. Рақамли эстетика: янги концептуал ёндашувлар // Фалсафа ва ҳаёт. – 2022.

– №2 (15). – Б. 45–52.

10.Галантер П. Компьютерная эстетика: Искусство и наука эстетических вычислений //

Leonardo Journal. – 2016. – Т. 49, №5. – С. 445–452.

11.Демартино А. Цифровое сознание и эстетика // Journal of Posthuman Studies. – 2020. –

Т. 4, №2. – С. 110–128.

12.https://translated.turbopages.org/proxy_u/ru-uz.ru.35b6f91d-68ff3d0f-0ebc1345-

74722d776562/https/ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Эстетика_цифрового_искусствa

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

DIGITAL AESTHETICS: A PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS. (2026). Universal International Scientific Journal, 3(3.1), 417-421. https://universaljournal.uz/index.php/uxij/article/view/218